The Winter Weather Events
of January 3-5, 2005

Answer to Question 7
Case Study
Case Study Page
Event Data
Previous Question
Next Question


7. Examine the 5:00pm storm-total rainfall estimates for the Vance-KVNX, Wichita-KICT, and Norman-KOUN radars.

  • About how much precipitation has fallen north of the freezing line?
  • Focus on Eastern Woods County. Do the three radar estimates agree on storm-total precipitation here? What may be some causes of disagreement?
  • Focus on Southeastern Woods County. Do the three radar estimates agree on storm-total precipitation here? What may be some causes of disagreement?





Answer.

  • The Vance AFB radar indicates precip accumulations of 1.5-2.0 inches across the now sub-freezing portions of northwest Oklahoma. The Wichita radar indicates up to 1.5 inches across much of this region, too. The Norman radar's estimates are much lower.
  • The differences between radar totals may be due to several possible factors:
    • The precip-accumulation algorithms began at different times at each radar: 0442 UTC at Vance; 0641 UTC at Wichita; 1324 UTC at Norman.
    • The three radars are sampling the atmosphere from three different distances. Thus, for any given point, each beam has a unique heights and a unique beamwidth. These will affect reflectivity measurements and subsequent calculations.
    • "Bright band" contamination may be occuring near the freezing level.
  • In southeast Woods County, the Vance radar is grossly underestimating reflectivity and precipitation due to beam-blockage immediately west-southwest of the radar

The Bottom Line:

    Radar can provide tremendous detail about the location and relative intensity of precipitation, but its accuracy is hampered by a number of limitations.


OK-FIRST Project, Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 100 East Boyd, Suite 1210, Norman, OK 73019
Copyright © 1996-2005 Oklahoma Climatological Survey. All Rights Reserved.
Send comments or questions concerning OK-FIRST to okfirst@mesonet.org.